[I also skipped quotation marks and dialog tags. They may or may not go back. I kind of like the ambiguity.]
[Barbara has collected stacks of notes and is reading from them as she and her Aunt Sheila sit on a log in a meadow an undetermined distance away from nearby houses.]
Leopard calling.
Leopard calling is something that chimps do. And maybe baboons.
Primatology
Yes, and behavior, if you need a keyword
Chimps are always competing for status. The top chimp is always under subtle or not
so subtle attack. But there’s one way
that he can sidetrack the pressure for a time.
You see, the top chimp is always alert, watching out for the
troop. He makes a special call that
alerts everyone that there is a leopard in the area. All of his lieutenants jump into position to
support him when he makes the call. And
for awhile after that, for the good of the group, there is cooperation against
an outside threat instead of competition within the group.
So, every once in awhile, if there’s been pressure building
from below. . .
. . . he leopard calls when there is no leopard.
That’s right. Human
leaders do it too. It’s also a well
known technique for bringing people, like voters, into a group that they
wouldn’t have otherwise felt the need to be part of.
That’s blog material, too.
It’s significant.
Certainly it’s something that humans need to know about humans.
Do you think that the top chimp does it on purpose. Or does he just start wanting to see a
leopard and maybe misinterprets something as a leopard.
That would certainly help make it convincing. But I can’t think of anyway to test it. And nothing related has ever made the Sunday
Supplements.
Barbara paused, stroking the side of the laptop.
Okaaay. How
about: “Jim Al-Khalili's Quantum: A
Guide for the Perplexed is about the best book I've found for explaining this
to a non-technical audience and has some beautiful illustrations besides. Give
that a shot.”
Books I’ve never read.
Sounds like a good one.
And we just need the title and author?
Yes.
Christopher Booker in his "Seven Basic Plots -- why we
tell stories"
Same. Although I’m
curious as to how much ‘why’ is in there and whether it’s Primatology.
Gotcha. “If you can
get any books be Eric Kandel, he is (IMO) the dude when it comes to
memory. Principles Of Neural Science
Memory...Mind to Molecules. If you read the first, you may be able to follow
the second.” That sounds like two books.
Yes, can you pick them apart? Sheila leaned over.
Yes. I think it’s
Principles Of Neural Science as one and Memory...Mind to Molecules as two.
And if it’s not, we’ll figure it out later.
Gotcha. How
about: Self-Coaching: How to Heal
Anxiety and Depression by Joseph J. Luciani, PhD, From Panic to Power by
Lucinda Bassett, The Feeling Good Handbook by David D. Burns, M.D., and Power
over Panic by Bronwyn Fox. I believe they are all available through Chapters.
Just the titles and authors.
Are you sure you want to spend the time on these. You’ve got stuff of your own going.
It’s easier to delete them then to get references for them
again.
Right. Included in
his works as author and/or editor are By the Late John Brockman, The Third
Culture, Digerati: Encounters with the Cyber Elite;editor of The Greatest
Inventions in the Past Two Thousand Years, and The Next Fifty Years : Science
in the First Half of the Twenty-First Century; Science at the Edge.
Sounds like a bunch of books by one author.
And it sounds computer related.
Yes, computers and how they change society. Have you ever read Isaac Asimov’s space
detective novels? One has a planetary
society in it where people are never in the same room as other people. There’s a taboo against it, like against
pooping in front of people.
Or farting in front of them.
I have a fart reference for you in Kurt Vonnegut’s
Galapagos.
Hang on. I want to
put that in my note doc instead of into the database.
College kids usually like Vonnegut.
While the title is misleading, Dennett's Consciousness
Explained is about the best take on consciousness from an evolutionary
philosophy point of view. If you want to get more into the technical
neurological detail of the brain and the processes of consciousness, I
recommend Ian Glynn's An Anatomy of Thought. (Warning, this is pretty
technical, despite being a nominally pop-science book, and you'll need a basic
knowledge of biochemistry and neurology to make good headway through many
sections of the book.)
Titles and Authors and the keyword dense
Cool. Now, I’m going
to shake my finger over this one.
Oh?
Yes. It says I don't
think you're geeky enough for the internet...
Not merely a joke, but an entire career: Vaughn Meader's The
First Family, released in 1962. It satirized JFK, his administration and his
family. It broke all sorts of records in sales and won the "best
album" Grammy. Everyone, including JFK himself, loved the album, and
Vaughn Meader was an instant superstar.
Then came November 22, 1963. The album was pulled off the shelves,
Meader's career was effectively over, and he basically never performed again,
with a few rare exceptions.
And your finger will shake because. . .
You got this off of the internet and printed it out. We hooked up to the internet to get rid of
all of these papers sitting around.
You’re not supposed to be adding to the mess.
Have I ever told you about the theory of the paperless
office?
No. But it sounds
like a good idea. We’ll probably evolve
to it eventually.
You’d think so. Unfortunately,
it’s one of those work expanding to fill the time available things. And a cover your ass thing.
Cover your ass?
Keep the record clear so no one can blame you for something
that you didn’t do. Office
communications can be tricky.
Now, you’ve suddenly got the capacity to make changes in a
document quickly. Where before it would
have required typing out a whole book to make a few changes, now you can just
slip the changes in. So everyone wants
to, right up until it goes out the door.
And as the document is routed for comments and approvals,
everyone wants to track the changes they requested, so copies are made. Copies will let you say later that you asked
for that change, or, no that’s Bill’s handwriting. So copies of multiple versions of the same
document are made and filed for future ass-covering purposes.
And since the copies can be made easily, instead of only by
carbon copy, everyone wants to make one and keep it. So they can remember to add it to their
resume if it turns out that being associated with the document turns out to be
a good thing.
Lots more changes.
Lots more versions. Lots more
copies. Filed in lots more places. Not less paper. More.
Word processing generated a lot more paper for any given office. Because the printout can’t be changed, but
the electronic version can. They can
change it as soon as you’ve approved it.
They can change it years later, trying to cover their own asses.
No paperless office until the electronic versions can be
locked into your personal equipment and used in the same way. And even then, anyone who has been in an
office long knows about the computer files that can no longer be read because
we don’t have that program any more. Or
we don’t have an old enough version of that program. Or the files got corrupted.
The computer can’t take six inch floppies any more. It can’t take ticker tape. It can’t take two inch floppy or a zip drive
or an Euler disc. The electronics go out
of fashion and you’re screwed. All that
data and no way to retrieve it.
But the paper can be read with your eyes. Just your eyes. No electronics necessary. The language isn’t going to change fast
enough to mess you up. Your eyes aren’t
going to upgrade to the point that they can’t read it. Paper is golden.
There will be no paperless office in my lifetime. Paperless archives, maybe. For organizations that can keep up with
maintaining them. So that shifts to new
programs or equipment won’t result in orphan files.
And maybe you’ll live long enough to see things slow down
and standardize. The train tracks
eventually standardized. The electricity
standardized. Computer Operating Systems
have standardized enough that you can read a document written on a Mac on an
IBM. There was a time when you couldn’t
do that. But I won’t live to see
it. I’ll see more paper, not less.
Are you finished?
I supposed. Eyes
batted.
Now, can you start a file for these things that you print
out, at least? I was going to ask you to
just email them to me. But if you need
to hold it and see it in your hand, that’s okay. I can do the extra work.
There was a pause, then their eyes met and they both cracked
up.
I’ll try to remember to email it to you. It’s just the old fogeyhood. And I do want to see them. Maybe in a 3-ring binder, when it’s all done. I like to flip through.
They’re starting to get computers that you can do that with.
Hugely expensive.
Probably. Next.
“I’m the end of a Raymond Carver Story” Cat and Girl
That’s from a webcomic.
I don’t know who Raymond Carver is or what his stories are like.
But you want to get the joke. I’ll add it to Books.
Thanks.
Then you’ve got the Kinky Friedman bibliography. I assume you’ve read some of them. I’m not reading off the ISBN’s.
Don't bother reading the titles. Just list them all with a question mark. I’ll go through and see if which ones I’ve
read. I can never decide if I’d really
enjoy meeting that man or if I’d want to slap his face in two minutes.
I’m going to have to try one, with that kind of
recommendation.
He is a true raconteur.
What is that.
A very special kind of story teller.
No comments:
Post a Comment
If you've read much of this blog, you know what the chances are that I'll keep up with moderating comments. You may be casting your comments into the howling void.